iEye

Media Mentoring Project of Cross Media Training Centre

More about Acacia and IDRC

Voting Results

The Online Web Newspaper Training Project

All conference reports

[Acacia Home]

[WebTimes Front Page]

ALL THE NEWS AND FEATURES

Acacia Home

Up
Overview
Opening
Poverty
Education
Access
Connectivity Africa
Policy Issues
Technologies
Birds of a Feather
Sidelights
Guest Columns
News releases

INTERACT!

Letters to the Editor

Staff Contacts

Forum

 

COVER YOUR CONFERENCE WITH A NEWSY WEBSITE

This interactive newspaper was developed and designed to work as a newspaper on any conference site that iEye covers. If you would like your conference or other event to be covered by WebTimes, and would like to do something for transformation of the media, please contact us.

For more information about iEye go and the Cross Media Training Centre, here.

Results of the voting

 

About Digivoting

 

Get digivoting results (Powerpoint zipped file

Size: 1.3MB) Go here

 

Debate:   Do ICTs have an impact on poverty alleviation?

Yes    

26.3%

Yes, it has the potential  

66.4%

Don’t know   

2.2%

No  

5.1%

Debate:  ICTs can resolve Africa’s education crisis.

Fully disagree

2.2%

Disagree

23.6%

No opinion

10.1%

Agree

37.1%

Fully agree

27%

Subject:  On a scale out of 10, I would rank ‘Session Content’ as:

10

9.0%

9

23.6%

8

21.3%

7

14.6%

6

11.2%

5

9.0%

4

3.4%

3

4.5%

2

2.2%

1

1.1%

Subject: On a scale out of 10, I would rank ‘Networking’ as:

10

3.6%

9

28.6%

8

19.6%

7

14.3%

6

12.5%

5

10.7%

4

6.2%

3

1.8%

2

0.9%

1

1.8%

Subject: On a scale out of 10, I would rank ‘Social/Cultural and Theatre Activities as:

10

16.4%

9

20.7%

8

41.4%

7

7.8%

6

3.4%

5

4.3%

4

1.7%

3

0.0%

2

1.7%

1

2.6%

Subject: On a scale out of 10, I would rank ‘The Theme Speaker’ as:

10

7.0%

9

23.5%

8

27.1%

7

21.2%

6

7.1%

5

7.1%

4

2.4%

3

1.1%

2

1.2%

1

2.4%

Subject:  On a scale out of 10, I would rank ‘The Agenda’ as:

10

8.3%

9

21.3%

8

19.4%

7

19.4%

6

9.3%

5

13.9%

4

1.9%

3

1.9%

2

4.6%

1

0.0%

Subject:  On a scale out of 10, I would rank ‘1st Debate’ as:

10

1.0%

9

18.0%

8

16.0%

7

22.0%

6

14.0%

5

10.0%

4

7.0%

3

6.0%

2

3.0%

1

3.0%

Subject:   On a scale out of 10, I would rank ‘2nd Debate’ as:

10

3.8%

9

18.3%

8

19.2%

7

14.4%

6

13.5%

5

8.7%

4

9.6%

3

4.8%

2

4.8%

1

2.9%

Subject: On a scale out of 10, I would rank ‘The Panel Sessions’ as:

10

3.7%

9

26.9%

8

15.7%

7

22.2%

6

12.0%

5

8.3%

4

5.6%

3

3.7%

2

0.9%

1

0.9%

Subject:  On a scale out of 10, I would rank ‘7 Minutes of Fame’ panel presentations as:

10

4.5%

9

24.3%

8

21.6%

7

26.1%

6

9.0%

5

6.3%

4

3.6%

3

0.9%

2

0.9%

1

2.7%

Subject:  On a scale out of 10, I would rank ‘Venue’ as:

10

23.7%

9

14.9%

8

35.1%

7

8.8%

6

6.1%

5

2.6%

4

0.0%

3

3.5%

2

0.9%

1

4.4%

Subject: On a scale out of 10, I would rank ‘Catering’’ as:

10

13.4%

9

24.1%

8

38.4%

7

4.5%

6

5.4%

5

5.4%

4

6.2%

3

0.0%

2

1.8%

1

0.9%

Subject: Telecentres are an Essential Component of Universal Access

 Fully disagree

10.9%

 Disagree 

14.9%

No opinion

5.0%

Agree

39.6%

Fully agree

29.7%

Subject: Is Liberalisation the Answer?

Deregulation

38.7%

Reregulation

61.3%

Subject: Telecentres: Theme Relevance

Highest           5

40.8%

 

38.0%

 

15.5%

 

2.8%

Lowest          1 

2.8%

Acceptance rate:

4.11

Subject: Telecentres: Theme Speaker: Benin

Highest           5

23.8%

4

30.2%

3

 28.6%

2

11.1%

Lowest            1

6.3%

Acceptance rate:

3.54

Subject: Telecentres: Panel

Highest           5

36.5

4

35.1%

3

18.9%

2

6.8%

Lowest            1

2.7%

Acceptance rate:

3.96

Subject: Telecentres: Theme Speaker: India

Highest           5

50.7%

5

26.8%

7

11.3%

5

7.0%

Lowest            1

4.2%

Acceptance rate:

4.13

Subject: Debate on Telecentres

Highest           5

36.2%

6

39.1%

8

14.5%

6

7.2%

Lowest            1

2.9%

Acceptance rate:

3.99

Subject: Policies for Africa’s Entry into the Information Society:  Theme Relevance

Highest           5

33.8%

7

40.8%

9

12.7%

7

2.8%

Lowest            1

9.9%

Acceptance rate:

3.86

Subject: Policies for Africa’s Entry into the Information Society:  Theme Speaker

 Highest           5 

28.3%

8

41.7%

10

18.3%

8

1.7%

Lowest            1

10.0%

Acceptance rate:

3.77

Subject: Policies for Africa’s Entry into the Information Society:  Panel

 Highest           5 

16.4%

9

37.3%

11

26.9%

9

13.4%

Lowest            1

6.0%

Acceptance rate:

3.45

Subject: Seven Minutes of Fame: Panel

 Highest           5 

21.0%

10

44.4%

12

23.5%

10

6.2%

Lowest            1

4.9%

Acceptance rate:

3.70

Subject: Donor Session

 Highest           5 

23.3%

11

28.8%

13

31.5%

11

6.8%

Lowest            1

9.6%

Acceptance rate:

3.49

Subject: Theatre Interventions

 Highest           5 

 61.6%

12

17.8%

14

13.7%

13

 2.7%

Lowest            1

4.1%

Acceptance rate:

4.30

Subject: Debate Format:

 Highest           5 

9.6%

13

31.5%

15

35.6%

13

12.3%

Lowest            1

11.0%

Acceptance rate:

3.16

Subject: Time Management

 Highest           5 

21.6%

14

31.1%

16

18.9%

14

12.2%

Lowest            1

16.2.0%

Acceptance rate:

3.30

Subject:  Catering

 Highest           5 

43.2%

15

 38.3%

17

7.4%

15

6.2%

Lowest            1

4.9%

Acceptance rate:

4.09

Subject: Comfort in Conference Room

 Highest           5 

27.2%

16

 29.6%

18

24.7%

16

12.3%

Lowest            1

6.2%

Acceptance rate:

3.59

Subject:  Services – Internet Café, WiFi

 Highest           5 

45.1%

17

19.7%

19

18.3%

17

12.7%

Lowest            1

4.2%

Acceptance rate:

3.89

Subject: Innovative ICTs for Development:  Theme Relevance

 Highest           5 

55.4%

18

 28.6%

20

5.4%

18

5.4%

Lowest            1

5.4%

Acceptance rate:

4.32

Subject: Innovative ICTs for Development:  Theme Speaker: Indonesia

 Highest           5 

75.0%

19

14.1%

21

10.9%

19

0.0%

Lowest            1

0.0%

Acceptance rate:

4.64

Subject: Innovative ICTs for Development:  Panel on Designing Technologies

 Highest           5 

20.0%

20

33.3%

22

35.0%

20

5.0%

Lowest            1

6.7%

Acceptance rate:

3.55

Subject: Birds of a Feature: Process

 Highest           5 

23.7%

21

  32.2%

23

   27.1%

21

16.9%

Lowest            1

 0.0%

Acceptance rate:

3.68

Subject: The Overall Conference

 Highest           5 

45.7%

22

 48.6%

24

4.3%

22

  0.0%

Lowest            1

1.4%

Acceptance rate:

4.37

End of voting results

To Top


WebTIMES copyright. Graeme Addison, webmaster for Editorial Assignments. All rights reserved. March 2003.

Contact webmaster: mediaman@worldonline.co.za

Vaal Cybercentre, Parys, South Africa

Site last updated: Tuesday July 29, 2003 09:15:50 PM