|
Results of the voting |
|
|
Debate: Do ICTs have an
impact on poverty alleviation? |
|
Yes |
26.3% |
|
Yes, it has the potential |
66.4% |
|
Don’t know |
2.2% |
|
No |
5.1% |
|
Debate: ICTs can resolve
Africa’s education crisis. |
|
Fully disagree |
2.2% |
|
Disagree |
23.6% |
|
No opinion |
10.1% |
|
Agree |
37.1% |
|
Fully agree |
27% |
|
Subject: On a scale out of 10, I
would rank ‘Session Content’ as: |
|
10 |
9.0% |
|
9 |
23.6% |
|
8 |
21.3% |
|
7 |
14.6% |
|
6 |
11.2% |
|
5 |
9.0% |
|
4 |
3.4% |
|
3 |
4.5% |
|
2 |
2.2% |
|
1 |
1.1% |
|
Subject: On a scale out of 10, I
would rank ‘Networking’ as: |
|
10 |
3.6% |
|
9 |
28.6% |
|
8 |
19.6% |
|
7 |
14.3% |
|
6 |
12.5% |
|
5 |
10.7% |
|
4 |
6.2% |
|
3 |
1.8% |
|
2 |
0.9% |
|
1 |
1.8% |
|
Subject: On a scale out of 10, I
would rank ‘Social/Cultural and Theatre Activities as: |
|
10 |
16.4% |
|
9 |
20.7% |
|
8 |
41.4% |
|
7 |
7.8% |
|
6 |
3.4% |
|
5 |
4.3% |
|
4 |
1.7% |
|
3 |
0.0% |
|
2 |
1.7% |
|
1 |
2.6% |
|
Subject: On a scale out
of 10, I would rank ‘The Theme Speaker’ as: |
|
10 |
7.0% |
|
9 |
23.5% |
|
8 |
27.1% |
|
7 |
21.2% |
|
6 |
7.1% |
|
5 |
7.1% |
|
4 |
2.4% |
|
3 |
1.1% |
|
2 |
1.2% |
|
1 |
2.4% |
|
Subject: On a scale out of 10, I would rank ‘The
Agenda’ as: |
|
10 |
8.3% |
|
9 |
21.3% |
|
8 |
19.4% |
|
7 |
19.4% |
|
6 |
9.3% |
|
5 |
13.9% |
|
4 |
1.9% |
|
3 |
1.9% |
|
2 |
4.6% |
|
1 |
0.0% |
|
Subject: On a scale out
of 10, I would rank ‘1st Debate’ as: |
|
10 |
1.0% |
|
9 |
18.0% |
|
8 |
16.0% |
|
7 |
22.0% |
|
6 |
14.0% |
|
5 |
10.0% |
|
4 |
7.0% |
|
3 |
6.0% |
|
2 |
3.0% |
|
1 |
3.0% |
|
Subject: On a scale out of 10, I would rank ‘2nd
Debate’ as: |
|
10 |
3.8% |
|
9 |
18.3% |
|
8 |
19.2% |
|
7 |
14.4% |
|
6 |
13.5% |
|
5 |
8.7% |
|
4 |
9.6% |
|
3 |
4.8% |
|
2 |
4.8% |
|
1 |
2.9% |
|
Subject: On a scale out of 10, I
would rank ‘The Panel Sessions’ as: |
|
10 |
3.7% |
|
9 |
26.9% |
|
8 |
15.7% |
|
7 |
22.2% |
|
6 |
12.0% |
|
5 |
8.3% |
|
4 |
5.6% |
|
3 |
3.7% |
|
2 |
0.9% |
|
1 |
0.9% |
|
Subject: On a scale out of 10, I
would rank ‘7 Minutes of Fame’ panel presentations as: |
|
10 |
4.5% |
|
9 |
24.3% |
|
8 |
21.6% |
|
7 |
26.1% |
|
6 |
9.0% |
|
5 |
6.3% |
|
4 |
3.6% |
|
3 |
0.9% |
|
2 |
0.9% |
|
1 |
2.7% |
|
Subject: On a scale out of 10, I
would rank ‘Venue’ as: |
|
10 |
23.7% |
|
9 |
14.9% |
|
8 |
35.1% |
|
7 |
8.8% |
|
6 |
6.1% |
|
5 |
2.6% |
|
4 |
0.0% |
|
3 |
3.5% |
|
2 |
0.9% |
|
1 |
4.4% |
|
Subject: On a scale out of 10, I
would rank ‘Catering’’ as: |
|
10 |
13.4% |
|
9 |
24.1% |
|
8 |
38.4% |
|
7 |
4.5% |
|
6 |
5.4% |
|
5 |
5.4% |
|
4 |
6.2% |
|
3 |
0.0% |
|
2 |
1.8% |
|
1 |
0.9% |
|
Subject: Telecentres are an
Essential Component of Universal Access |
|
Fully disagree |
10.9% |
|
Disagree |
14.9% |
|
No opinion |
5.0% |
|
Agree |
39.6% |
|
Fully agree |
29.7% |
|
Subject: Is Liberalisation the
Answer? |
|
Deregulation |
38.7% |
|
Reregulation |
61.3% |
|
Subject: Telecentres: Theme
Relevance |
|
Highest 5 |
40.8% |
|
|
38.0% |
|
|
15.5% |
|
|
2.8% |
|
Lowest 1 |
2.8% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
4.11 |
|
Subject: Telecentres: Theme Speaker: Benin |
|
Highest 5 |
23.8% |
|
4 |
30.2% |
|
3 |
28.6% |
|
2 |
11.1% |
|
Lowest 1 |
6.3% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
3.54 |
|
Subject: Telecentres: Panel |
|
Highest 5 |
36.5 |
|
4 |
35.1% |
|
3 |
18.9% |
|
2 |
6.8% |
|
Lowest 1 |
2.7% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
3.96 |
|
Subject: Telecentres: Theme Speaker: India |
|
Highest
5 |
50.7% |
|
5 |
26.8% |
|
7
|
11.3% |
|
5 |
7.0% |
|
Lowest
1 |
4.2% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
4.13 |
|
Subject: Debate on Telecentres |
|
Highest
5 |
36.2% |
|
6 |
39.1% |
|
8
|
14.5% |
|
6 |
7.2% |
|
Lowest
1 |
2.9% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
3.99 |
|
Subject: Policies for Africa’s Entry into the
Information Society: Theme
Relevance |
|
Highest
5 |
33.8% |
|
7 |
40.8% |
|
9 |
12.7% |
|
7 |
2.8% |
|
Lowest
1 |
9.9% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
3.86 |
|
Subject: Policies for Africa’s Entry into the
Information Society: Theme Speaker |
|
Highest
5 |
28.3% |
|
8 |
41.7% |
|
10 |
18.3% |
|
8 |
1.7% |
|
Lowest
1 |
10.0% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
3.77 |
|
Subject: Policies for Africa’s Entry into the
Information Society: Panel |
|
Highest
5 |
16.4% |
|
9 |
37.3% |
|
11 |
26.9% |
|
9 |
13.4% |
|
Lowest
1 |
6.0% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
3.45 |
|
Subject: Seven Minutes of Fame: Panel |
|
Highest
5 |
21.0% |
|
10 |
44.4% |
|
12 |
23.5% |
|
10 |
6.2% |
|
Lowest
1 |
4.9% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
3.70 |
|
Subject: Donor Session
|
|
Highest
5 |
23.3% |
|
11 |
28.8% |
|
13 |
31.5% |
|
11 |
6.8% |
|
Lowest
1 |
9.6% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
3.49 |
|
Subject: Theatre Interventions
|
|
Highest
5 |
61.6% |
|
12 |
17.8% |
|
14 |
13.7% |
|
13 |
2.7% |
|
Lowest
1 |
4.1% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
4.30 |
|
Subject: Debate Format: |
|
Highest
5 |
9.6% |
|
13 |
31.5% |
|
15 |
35.6% |
|
13 |
12.3% |
|
Lowest
1 |
11.0% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
3.16 |
|
Subject: Time Management
|
|
Highest
5 |
21.6% |
|
14 |
31.1% |
|
16 |
18.9% |
|
14 |
12.2% |
|
Lowest
1 |
16.2.0% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
3.30 |
|
Subject: Catering
|
|
Highest
5 |
43.2% |
|
15 |
38.3% |
|
17 |
7.4% |
|
15 |
6.2% |
|
Lowest
1 |
4.9% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
4.09 |
|
Subject: Comfort in Conference Room
|
|
Highest
5 |
27.2% |
|
16 |
29.6% |
|
18 |
24.7% |
|
16 |
12.3% |
|
Lowest
1 |
6.2% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
3.59 |
|
Subject: Services – Internet Café, WiFi
|
|
Highest
5 |
45.1% |
|
17 |
19.7% |
|
19 |
18.3% |
|
17 |
12.7% |
|
Lowest
1 |
4.2% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
3.89 |
|
Subject: Innovative ICTs for Development:
Theme Relevance |
|
Highest
5 |
55.4% |
|
18 |
28.6% |
|
20 |
5.4% |
|
18 |
5.4% |
|
Lowest
1 |
5.4% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
4.32 |
|
Subject: Innovative ICTs for Development:
Theme Speaker: Indonesia |
|
Highest
5 |
75.0% |
|
19 |
14.1% |
|
21 |
10.9% |
|
19 |
0.0% |
|
Lowest
1 |
0.0% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
4.64 |
|
Subject: Innovative ICTs for Development:
Panel on Designing Technologies
|
|
Highest
5 |
20.0% |
|
20 |
33.3% |
|
22 |
35.0% |
|
20 |
5.0% |
|
Lowest
1 |
6.7% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
3.55 |
|
Subject: Birds of a Feature: Process |
|
Highest
5 |
23.7% |
|
21 |
32.2% |
|
23 |
27.1% |
|
21 |
16.9% |
|
Lowest
1 |
0.0% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
3.68 |
|
Subject: The Overall Conference |
|
Highest
5 |
45.7% |
|
22 |
48.6% |
|
24 |
4.3% |
|
22 |
0.0% |
|
Lowest
1 |
1.4% |
|
Acceptance rate: |
4.37 |
|
End of voting results |
|
To Top |